Writing Good Tickets: Tips, Types, and Common Pitfalls

Effective ticketing is at the heart of agile product development. Clear, well-structured tickets ensure that teams know exactly what to build, why it matters, and how each piece of work connects to the overall project goals. In this post, we explain the different ticket types—epics, stories, and technical tickets—offer practical tips on writing them, discuss how to manage ticket relationships, and point out common pitfalls to avoid.

The Hierarchy of Tickets

Agile teams often organize work using a hierarchy that flows from high-level objectives to actionable technical tasks. Here’s how it breaks down:

• Epic: A large body of work that covers a big subject or goal and is broken down into multiple features. It provides a strategic vision.
• (User) Story: Derived from an epic, each story represents a discrete action or need that a user can perform. Stories are written in plain language with general acceptance criteria that ensure the functionality delivers user value.
• Ticket (Task): One or more tickets stem from a story. These are technical descriptions that outline what must be implemented for the feature to be built. They uncover unknowns and detail the technical requirements so developers have clear implementation guidance.

Best Practices for Writing Tickets

1. Write User Stories that Focus on Value

Start your planning at the highest level. A well-written user story typically follows the format:

As a [type of user], I want [goal] so that [benefit].

To ensure clarity and alignment, every user story should clearly state who the user is, what they want, and why it matters. For example:

• Epic (Reframed as a User Story):
  As a new user, I want to create a personalized account so that I can receive a customized experience tailored to my preferences.

From this epic, you can derive smaller, more actionable user stories:

• Story 1:
  As a potential customer, I want to sign up for the system so that I can start using personalized features immediately.
  (This story focuses on the signup process that leads to a tailored user experience.)
• Story 2:
  As a returning user, I want to log in to the system so that I can access my saved preferences and continue enjoying a customized experience.
  (This story ensures that once a user has signed up, they can seamlessly re-access their personalized settings.)

By keeping the format consistent—identifying the user, their goal, and the benefit—you create a clear, user-centric narrative that guides development and fosters valuable conversations among team members.

2. Break Down Stories into Actionable Tickets

Once you have clear user stories, decompose each story into technical tickets. These tickets should be specific, focused, and clearly describe what needs to be built. They act as “to-do” items for developers. Some tips include:

• Keep Tickets Focused: Each ticket should cover one piece of work. Avoid bundling multiple unrelated tasks into one ticket.
• Write in Technical Detail: While stories remain user-centric, tickets are where you define the “how.” Include technical requirements, assumptions to validate, and any dependencies.
• Define Acceptance Criteria: Tickets should uncover unknowns by clarifying what is required. If assumptions exist (e.g. using a database table that may not exist), plan a research spike first.

3. Manage Ticket Relationships

It’s common for work to depend on other pieces. Explicitly document dependencies:

• Link Related Tickets: For example, if a frontend and backend must communicate via a new API, create a ticket for API design that is linked to both the frontend and backend tasks.
• Define Order of Operations: If one ticket must be completed before another can begin, note that dependency clearly. This helps developers and stakeholders understand sequencing and prevents delays.
• Avoid Overlapping Work: Where multiple tasks share dependencies, consider creating a shared dependency ticket (e.g. API definition) that is referenced by all related work.

4. Don’t Assume Definitive Plans Without Research

A common pitfall is writing tickets as if every assumption is correct. In agile, it is critical to first conduct a research “spike” when:

• Requirements are unclear (e.g. being told to use data from a DB table that might not exist).
• Technical feasibility has not been verified.
  By planning a spike, teams validate assumptions before committing to implementation, reducing wasted effort and costly rework.

A Practical Example: Signup and Login Flow

Let’s illustrate these ideas with a concrete example. Suppose your epic is:

Epic: As a user, I want the app to be customized to me.

From this epic, you derive two user stories:

Story 1: User Signup

Story: As a user, I want to be able to sign up for the system so that I can personalize my experience.

This story can be broken down into several technical tickets:

• Ticket 1: Build User Database
  Description: Design and implement the user database schema. Include tables for user profiles, secure password storage (e.g. hashing, encryption), and required validations.
  Dependency: Must be completed before building the signup page.
  
  
• Ticket 2: Build Signup Page
  Description: Develop a responsive signup form that collects user data (name, email, password, etc.). Include front-end validation and error messaging.
  Dependency: Uses the user database for storing data; design should follow UI/UX best practices.
  
  
• Ticket 3: Build Email Confirmation Process
  Description: Implement backend functionality to send a confirmation email upon signup. Generate a secure token, create an API endpoint for confirming the email, and handle edge cases (e.g., expired tokens).
  Dependency: Should only be executed once the signup page and user database are in place.
  
  

Story 2: User Login

Story: As a user, I want to be able to log in to the system so that I can access my personalized features.

This story decomposes into additional tickets:

• Ticket 1: Build Login Page
  Description: Create the login UI with fields for email/username and password. Include client-side validation and design for responsiveness.
  Dependency: Must align with the signup process design.
  
  
• Ticket 2: Implement Authentication Logic
  Description: Write the backend code to validate user credentials against the user database. Implement session management or token-based authentication to securely grant access.
  Dependency: Requires that the user database is implemented and integrated with the signup process.
  
  
• Ticket 3: Fetch User Data Post-Login
  Description: Develop an API endpoint to retrieve user profile data once authentication is complete. Ensure proper error handling and performance optimizations (e.g., caching where applicable).
  Dependency: Relies on both the authentication logic and the underlying user database.
  
  

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

When writing tickets, remember these key mistakes:

• Over-specification: Do not include technical implementation details in user stories; leave that for the technical tickets.
• Vague Descriptions: Ensure every story and ticket includes clear acceptance criteria and definitions of done. Use the INVEST model as a guideline (Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable).
• Ignoring Dependencies: Failing to document ticket relationships can lead to confusion and delays.
• Skipping Research (Spike): Don’t assume all requirements are correct. If there is uncertainty—such as unverified assumptions about data availability—plan a spike before writing definitive tickets.

Good tickets are the backbone of efficient agile development. By structuring work as epics, user stories, and technical tickets, you ensure that every feature is both user-centric and technically actionable. Manage dependencies carefully and always verify assumptions with a research spike before committing to implementation. The clear examples above demonstrate how to break down complex features like user signup and login into manageable, well-defined tasks. When your tickets are clear, detailed, and interconnected, your team can focus on building a product that truly delivers value.

By following these industry-standard practices, your team can improve clarity, reduce rework, and ensure that every piece of work is aligned with the overall vision. Happy ticketing!

‍